Saturday, July 31, 2021



By Ben Klassen - 1973

In the previous material it has been fairly well proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that Christianity is a suicidal philosophy or teaching. If taken seriously enough by its followers it will destroy them, and if a whole race or nation takes it seriously enough and faithfully attempts to follow the teachings of the Sermon on the Mount then that whole nation will destroy itself.

The great Roman nation, the finest civilization produced by the White Race in classical times, in the first few centuries A.D., did take Christianity seriously, and it did destroy itself, never to rise again.

Where did Christianity originate? If we read the Jewish Bible, the Old Testament and the New Testament, we will not get the correct answers. The fact is Christianity is, and was, a Jewish creation, dreamed up, composed, and promoted by the hierarchy of the Jewish Race, undoubtedly, by the Elders of the Sanhedrin itself.

It is, in fact, an unholy teaching designed to unhinge and derange the White Gentile intellect and to cause him to abandon his real responsibilities of doing that for which Nature created him. It is an unnatural and completely perverted attitude towards the natural surroundings with which Nature has provided us.

Whereas the full impact of it completely destroyed the Roman Empire within less than two centuries after it became the adopted religion of Rome, it is today still an overriding influence hanging like a shadow over the affairs and thinking of the White Race throughout the world. It is, therefore, important that we trace its origin, despite the fact that much evidence has been deliberately destroyed and many roadblocks have been placed in the way of objectively even considering the evidence that still survives.

Anyone recapturing his senses and looking at that evidence will find that its origin is much different from what our church fathers today would have us believe. However, let us take at face value what the church fathers and the “Holy” bible are teaching us today. The first page of the New Testament, Matthew 1, immediately makes it clear that Jesus was a Jew and it traces his genealogy all the way from Abraham through David through Joseph to Christ. At another place it gives the genealogy of Mary, and makes sure that we are fully aware that she, too, is a Jew.

Here, immediately, the first major contradiction is revealed, glaringly revealed, that is, if Jesus was the Son of God how could he also be the son of Joseph?

Anyway, be that as it may, we now look at the disciples of Jesus and the apostles and we find that Matthew, who supposedly wrote the first book in the New Testament, was also called Levi, son of Altheus, and was, as so many Jews are, a tax collector in Capernaum. We find that the Apostle Mark, who wrote the second book of the New Testament, was also called John Mark, the son of Mary, in whose home in Jerusalem the early Christians gathered and he was a cousin of Barnabas. We find, that above all, Mark was also a Jew. We now come to St. Luke, who was probably the only Gentile in the group of twelve. Historians regard him as a Gentile physician. However, he was under the complete dominance of Paul, who was a proselyte Jew, and Luke spent most of his life as a disciple traveling around in the company of Paul, the Jew.

We now come to the Apostle John whom we find is also a Jew, along with his brothers Peter and James.

We now come to the Apostle Paul, who changed his name from the real name of Saul, born in Tarsus, of Jewish parents, and a man who was reared strictly in the Jewish tradition of the Pharisees of his time. Of the 27 books of the New Testament, it was Paul who is credited with writing 14 of them and credited with writing well over half of the New Testament itself.

And so it goes. Of the 12 disciples that Christ supposedly had, all of them were Jews with the possible exception of Luke and as we noted he was completely under the influence of Paul. It is more than passing strange that, according to the New Testament itself, the writers, preachers, and apostles of this “New Teaching,” as well as the supposed founder himself, are all Jews, with very little exception. It is more than passing strange also that the Jews themselves never accepted this highly suicidal teaching but were tremendously active in promoting and foisting it on the White Gentiles in general, and the great Roman nation in particular.

We do not doubt that these Jewish characters were fanatically active in promoting the suicidal new teaching of Christianity, nor do we doubt that they had not only hundreds but thousands of Jewish helpers that were the “Hidden Hand” that  promoted  the  spread  of  this  teaching  among  the  Romans and Gentiles in the Roman Empire. There is, however, serious doubt that such a character as Jesus Christ ever lived at all, and there is, however, overwhelming evidence to indicate that he did not exist, but was a figment of the Jewish imagination.

The beginning of the Christian era found Rome near the height of her civilization. Her supremacy, in the then known world, was pretty much unchallenged and it was the beginning of a long period of peace. To be specific, Pax Romana (Roman Peace) lasted approximately 200 years beginning with the reign of Caesar Augustus. Rome was highly literate; there were many great writers, scholars, historians, sculptors and painters, not to mention other outstanding men of philosophy and learning.

Yet it is highly strange that despite the great commotion and fanfare that supposedly heralded the birth of Christ and also his crucifixion (according to the bible), we find not a single historian nor a single writer of the era who found time to take note of it in their writings. Outside of the fabricated biblical writings, no Roman historian, no Roman writer, and no Roman play-writer, has left the slightest hint that he had the faintest awareness that this supposedly greatest of all greats was in their very midst and preaching what is claimed the greatest of all the new gospels.

Whereas Caesar left voluminous writings that are still extant today and can be studied by our high school boys and girls, Christ himself, who had supposedly the greatest message to deliver to posterity that the world has ever known, left not the slightest scrap of paper on which he had written a single word. This, in fact, the biblical literature itself confirms and mentions only that once he did write in the sand.

Today we can still study Cicero’s great orations and writings. He has left over 800 letters behind that we can study to this day. We can study whole books of what Marcus Aurelius wrote, we can study what Aristotle wrote, what Plato wrote, and scores of others that were contemporary with the first beginning of the Christian era, or preceded it. But strangely there is not a word that is in writing that could be attributed to Jesus Christ himself.

Furthermore, the Greeks and the Romans of that era, and even previously and afterwards, had developed the art of sculpturing to a fine state. We can find busts of Cicero, of Caesar, Of Marcus Aurelius and innumerable other Greek and Roman dignitaries and lesser lights, but no one seemed to think it important enough to sculpture a likeness of Jesus Christ. And the reason undoubtedly is there was none to model at the time. There were undoubtedly numerous skilled artists and painters at that time, but again strangely enough none took the time or the interest to paint a likeness of this purportedly greatest of all teachers, who in fact was proclaimed the Son of God come to earth. But no painting was ever made of this man, who, we are told, gathered great multitudes around him and caused great consternation and fear even to King Herod of Judea himself.

Now all of this is very, very strange, when, if, as the Bible claims, the birth of Jesus Christ was ushered in with great fanfare and great proclamations. Angels proclaimed his birth. An exceedingly bright star pointed to his place of birth. In Matt. 2:3, it says, “When Herod, the king, had heard of these things he was troubled and all Jerusalem with him.” We can hardly gather from this that no one was aware of the fact that the King of the Jews, the great Messiah, was born, for we are told in the preceding verse that the Wise Men came to King Herod himself saying, “Where is he that is born King of the Jews, for we have seen his star in the East and we are come to worship him.” Evidently the event was even lit up with a bright star from heaven. In any case, King Herod, we are told in Matt. 3, was so worried that he sent the Wise Men to Bethlehem to search diligently for the young child to bring it to him so he undoubtedly could have him put to death. As the story further unfolds we learn that Joseph heard of this and quietly slipped out in the night taking with him his wife, the young child and a donkey and departed for Egypt. When Herod found out that he had been tricked it says that he “was exceedingly wroth and sent forth and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under.”

Now this is a tremendously drastic act for a King to take, that is, to have murdered all the children in the land that were under two years of age. Again we can hardly say that the birth of Jesus was unheralded, unannounced and unobserved, according to the story in the bible. However, it is very, very strange that this act of Herod, as drastic and criminally harsh as it is, is nowhere else recorded in the histories or writings of any of the other numerous writers of the times. All we have is the claims of those people who wrote the New Testament. In fact, whoever wrote the New Testament invented so many claims that are inconsistent with the facts of history that they even made a rather glaring error by pulling King Herod into the story. History tells us that in the year 1 A.D., when Christ was supposedly born, Herod had already been dead for four years. He could hardly have been disturbed or very wroth about the birth of anybody in the year 1 A.D.

There is further great evidence that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John never wrote any of those chapters that are supposedly attributed to them. What historical evidence can be dug up reveals that they were written much later, not at the time that Jesus supposedly said all those things, but somewhere around 30 to 50 years later by a person or persons at this point unknown. Furthermore, when we compare the first four books of the gospel with each other, which supposedly tell more or less the same story, we find that they contradict each other in so many details that one need only read them for himself to pick them out. I neither have the time, the space, nor the inclination to go into all these contradictions. They are too numerous.

I do not contend that it really makes a great deal of difference whether there ever was a Jewish character by the name of Jesus Christ that led to the creation of a new religion to be foisted on the White Race for their destruction. The point is that, in any case, it was the Jews collectively who created and promoted this new teaching upon the White Race and it did destroy the Roman civilization.

Nevertheless, the evidence is overwhelming that these ideas long preceded the Christian era and it was not Christ who came out with them but a Jewish sect called the Essenes who lived on the border of the Dead Sea. It was they who had already evolved the ideas contained in the Sermon on the Mount but have been attributed to Christ. Not only had they evolved the same ideas as set forth in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, but the wording, the phraseology and the sentences were the same and they preceded the supposed time of the Sermon on the Mount by anywhere from 50 to 150 years.

The Essenes were a Jewish religious group living in approximately the first century B.C. and the first century A.D. We have important sources of their contemporary writings in the historian Josephus and also in the philosopher Philo. They are also mentioned by various other Roman and Greek writers of those times in which their religious teachings are revealed in considerable detail. However, in the last twenty years the thousands of Dead Sea Scrolls, many of which were written by the Essenes themselves, reveal a tremendous amount of insight into their religious teachings, and above all, reveal that they preceded and preempted the Sermon on the Mount word for word, so that the so-called “new” teachings of a figure supposedly appearing from heaven in the year 1 A.D., and preaching during the years 30 to 33 A.D., were neither original nor were they new.

Furthermore, we learn that the Essenes were notable for their communistic society, their extreme piety and purity and their practice of celibacy. They possessed all their worldly goods in common and looked upon private property as an evil which might divert them from sanctity. They engaged in agriculture and handicrafts, considering these occupations less sinful than others. They also practiced baptism, and this practice preceded the Christian era by at least one hundred years. So the Christian apostles can hardly be credited with having instituted the ritual of baptism, as is claimed.

Why, the average reader might ask, haven’t we been told more about the Essenes if they were the original practitioners of Christianity? There are two good and overriding answers for that. The Christians on their part, although the early Christian fathers were well aware of the Essene teachings and writings, took every measure possible to destroy them and purge them from circulation. The reason being they did not want their presence known because it would undermine their dogma that Christ was the originator of the New teaching. It would make impossible the claim that this was a great new revelation sent forth by God himself amid the hosannas and singing of angels. The Jews, on the other hand, did not want to reveal the presence of the Essenes because they wished to completely hide any connection between the Jews and the new religious teaching that they were about to administer unto the Gentiles. They even went to great lengths to appear hostile to it.

Before I go further into the highly illuminating and highly interesting Dead Sea Scrolls I want to make just one further point, and that is that the original manuscripts on which the New Testament is supposedly based is always alluded to being translated from the “Original Greek.” Since the New Testament repeats over and over again that Paul spoke to his flock in Jewish and that Jesus spoke in Jewish and that the Apostles were Jewish, why, then, is it that the manuscripts were all in Greek?

The historical facts add up to this: the Jewish hierarchy and undoubtedly the whole conspiracy was well coordinated and had many, many members and co-workers. It was not written at the time of Christ at all, but the movement was given great promotion by the combined efforts of the Jewish nation. As they organized and promoted their ideas further, these were reduced to writing considerably later than the years 30 to 33 A.D., when Christ supposedly came out with these startling and “new” revelations. The conclusions are that they were written by Jewish persons whose identity we shall never know and were written collectively by many authors, were revised from time to time and not only in their original formation and formulation but have been revised time and time again throughout the centuries to become more effective and more persuasive propaganda. However, we want to go further into the teachings of the Essenes and who they were and why their particular teachings were pounced upon by the Jews to be formulated into a well distilled poisonous brew and then fed to the Gentiles.

The Dead Sea Scrolls, which are more numerous and much more revealing than the Jewish press of today has informed us, tell us much about the teachings and the life of the Essenes. One of the important things that they tell us about the Essenes is that they vanished from the face of the earth after about two centuries of existence and the termination date being somewhere around the year 100 A.D. They were, needless to say, only a very small sect of the Jewish tribes and not a part of the Jewish conspiracy as such. Being outside of the mainstream of Jewish activity and thought, the Jews nevertheless observed from them that this kind of teaching could ruin and destroy a people. The Jews, looking for a way to destroy the Roman nation, who in the year 70 A.D. had destroyed and leveled Jerusalem to the ground, noted well what these teachings were and decided to perpetuate them on the Romans.

Essenism was really a revolutionary new form of social order, an ideal cooperative commonwealth in miniature. Instead of the Messiah, the ideal of the Essenes was the “Teacher of Righteousness”. They established a new cooperative communitarian brotherhood and they were the first religious society to establish and observe the sacraments of baptism and the eucharistic meal. Most important of all, they were the first group to condemn and abolish the age old institution of human slavery. Furthermore, the “Teacher of Righteousness” as promulgated by the Essenes may not have been the first pacifist in history, but he was the first to implement his pacifist theories with an overall practical measure, which if generally adopted, would abolish war. This, of course, was a wonderful religion for the Jews to sell to the Romans, for if they could convert the Romans into submissive pacifists they could certainly soon thereafter dominate them in full. And this they did.

The Essenes lived in the area of Qumran near the Dead Sea and according to Philo, the Jewish Philosopher and writer contemporary of that age, “the Essene brotherhood would not allow the manufacture of any weapons or allow within their community any maker of arrows, spears, swords or any manufacture of engines of war, nor any man occupied with a military avocation, or even with peaceful practices which might easily be converted to mischief.” Not only does Philo tell us about the Essenes, but also Josephus and Pliny, both contemporary historians, tell us much about the Essenes.

As mentioned before, much is emerging also from the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The overriding fact that emerges from the study of the writings of the historians of that time and the Dead Sea Scrolls is this tremendously significant fact: namely that the beliefs, teachings, and practices attributed to Jesus Christ, although not exactly identical in all respects with those of the Essene school, were nevertheless, closer to those of the Essenes than to those of the Bishops of the Ecumenical Council which determined the Nicene Creed of orthodox Christianity.

So we come to the obvious conclusion that the Christian beliefs and doctrines as supposedly enunciated by Christ in the Sermon on the Mount did not originate at all at that time but at least 100 years earlier from a Jewish sect called the Essenes living near the Dead Sea; that the Elders of the Sanhedrin recognized this teaching as being deadly and suicidal; that they further took this doctrine and distilled and refined it into a working creed; the Jews then, with a great deal of energy and tremendous amounts of propaganda (in which they excel), promoted and distributed this poisonous doctrine among the Romans.

Setting this creed down in writing in what is now called the New Testament evolved over the next several centuries. It was written by persons unknown to us today but undoubtedly of Jewish origin. Furthermore, to give it a mystical and heavenly sent deification, they invented the person of Jesus Christ, and claimed that he was the Son of God. Then, having laid the groundwork for this new church, they consolidated that power at a meeting in Nicaea, where the creation of the new church was solidified, the creed formalized and given official sanctification.

Thus, in short, was launched the new church and the new religion of “Jesus Christ,” who was fabricated out of thin air. Not a single trace of the Jesus Christ personage can be found in authentic history. Nevertheless, this newly fabricated hoax of Jesus Christ, the Son of God – this idea, with all its suicidal doctrines, was soon to pull down in ruins the great Roman Empire and the great White civilization that went with it.

Never again did the White Race shake off the control of the Jews. Never again did the White Man regain control of his own thinking, of his own religion, his own finances, nor his own government. Unto this day the White Race has not regained control of its own destiny.

It is the unalterable goal of our new religion, CREATIVITY, and the CHURCH OF THE CREATOR, to again have the White Man regain unconditional control of his own destiny and his own future.

To do this we, first of all, have to straighten out the White Man’s thinking. That is what this book is all about.

Friday, July 30, 2021

Religious Exemption Documents for Kungflu:

Religious Exemption Documents for Kungflu:

I have been receiving dozens of direct messages on Gab over the past week with people from around the country sharing the horrors from inside the United States Military and their places of employment regarding "mandatory" non-FDA approved experimental Covid vaccinations. Many people are being forced to choose between feeding their families and getting injected with a potentially deadly experimental substance. This is a fundamental violation of not only human rights, but the religious rights that we are guaranteed in the United States of America. 

I stumbled upon a set of religious exemption documents that the creator calls an “air tight religious exemption request” for the COVID vaccine if it is mandatory for you at work, school, or in the military. You can download these here and customize them to your individual scenario.

The Full Document is everything necessary for a US Army Soldier to submit a religious exemption request to his immediate commander, with only certain portions needing to be edited to include your name, unit, and details.

The “Religious + Practical Side Supporting Documents” contains all of the details giving both the religious reasons for why Christians cannot receive the Vaccine, and the practical reasons for why it isn’t actually necessary to receive the Vaccine.

The Religious and Practical Side Supporting Documents are also separated in case you specifically need either one without the other.

We are human beings made in the image of God. We have God-given human rights and should not be forced to choose between feeding our families and putting something that is potentially deadly into our bodies. As a reminder is the only social network on the internet that allows criticism and discussion about the experimental non-FDA approved Covid vaccine.

Andrew Torba


This Weeks Radio Show:

  This weeks radio show will be live on Sunday at 20.00 est / 19.00 ct time. Subjects to be announced....



By Ben Klassen - 1981

WMB - CC #30

Once the Crown Jewel of the Caribbean. The westerly third of the Caribbean island of Hispaniola in the West Indies is today called Haiti. It is the only completely nigger “republic” in the Western Hemisphere. It has had independence since 1804, only about 25 years less than the United States itself. Before 1789 this small piece of real estate, under the ownership of French and other European planters, was as rich, or richer, in productivity as all the thirteen American colonies combined.

Now a Pest Hole. By 1804, fifteen years later, San Domingo, as it had been called under French rule, lay in shambles. The White population had been brutally tortured, murdered and exterminated down to the last man, woman and child. Anarchy, misery, poverty, starvation and cannibalism has been rampant ever since. It is now, and has been for over a century and three-quarters the most backward, poverty-ridden “republic” in the Western Hemisphere despite its bountiful climate and once productive soil.

* * * * *

Powerful Lesson for us. It behooves us to summarily study the turbulent history of Haiti, because I believe that there, in telescopic version, we can view the possible future destruction of the White Race in America. The same forces are at work, the same issues are at stake, and the same methods are being employed — all concentrated on the focal point of Jewish goals — the destruction of the White Race. We should (and we must) learn a powerful lesson from its history.

Year of 1789. Let us use the year of 1789 as the point of departure in the history of San Domingo. At the time, as we have indicated, San Domingo was a thriving prosperous French colony, considered as the “Crown Jewel” of the French colonial system. It was, in fact the richest colony anywhere in the world. The population had only forty thousand Whites, mostly French, with a smattering of adventurous and hardy Dutch, Germans and other nationalities. By this time there also existed approximately 27,000 mulattoes, many of whom were freed men and property owners. Add to this racial melee approximately 450,000 black African niggers, most of which were African born, and as savage and docile as their cannibal kinsmen on the Dark Continent itself.

Most Prosperous. Under the genius and direction of the White plantation owners the colony enjoyed an outstanding prosperity. In fact, despite a large proportion of this small area being mountainous, in 1789 it was considered as undoubtedly the most prosperous of all the European colonies. Furthermore, its prosperity was increasing by leaps and bounds, the planters having doubled their investments and productivity in the three previous years. It supplied not only France, but half of Europe with sugar, coffee and cotton.

Jewish Havoc in France. We will remember that it was about this time the Jews were fomenting the French Revolution back in France itself, with cries of “Liberty, Equality and Fraternity,” — Jewish catchwords, as the “Protocols” point out, with which to disarm and destroy their enemies. These Jewish ideas were soon exported to San Domingo in order to wreak havoc and destruction on that thriving and prosperous colony. They were skillfully employed to massacre the White population and turn the remaining shambles over to the savage niggers.

 The new revolutionary French government in Paris did more than just export their revolutionary ideas.

Hybrid Government and Poly-racial Subjects. Whereas this crown jewel of the French colonial empire enjoyed vigorous growth and prosperity, the hybrid civil and military administration called a government was a frightful mixture of tyranny and anarchy. The colonists themselves were hot with discontent. Added to this ferment was the multi-racial admixture of the population. The scarcity of White women had made illicit relations between the White colonists and the female blacks inevitable from the first. The resultant mulattoes stood out as a definite caste midway between the Whites and the blacks and were known as the “free people of color.” Numbering some twenty-seven thousand and possessing a considerable share of the island’s wealth, they were a factor of strategic importance, although in 1789 they did not possess the right to vote.

Blacks predominate. The most numerous by far however were the African slaves themselves, numbering, as we said, approximately 450,000. As has been stated by observers of the times, African slavery was the curse of San Domingo. They were described by a contemporary writer as “quarrelsome, boastful, given to thievery and lying.” “The Africans,” he says, “usually remained indolent and lazy” and addicted to many absurd superstitions. More than half the slave population was born in Africa, but there remained very little difference between these savages and the native born variety.

Racial Hot-bed. This was the racial hot-bed of 1789. The mulattoes hated the Whites and were intensely jealous of their superiority. They also hated the niggers and looked upon them with scorn and disdain. The niggers harbored a pathological hatred for both the Whites and the mulattoes. The Whites themselves (as usual) were badly divided into various factions, but were united in strictly drawing the color line. Sitting on this dangerous cauldron of rebellious savages and hostile mulattoes, the Whites realized that any breach of the color line meant the destruction of themselves and their property and the White population lived in continuous fear of a black uprising.

Jewish Incendiaries. Into this prosperous but seething cauldron came the Jewish wreckers from Paris. Themselves never planters, but mostly slave traders and exploiters, they were ready to wreak havoc on this prosperous “Gem of the West Indies”.

The way they did it should be a harsh but extremely valuable lesson to our White Racial Comrades of today. The policy for destruction of San Domingo was MADE IN PARIS, STEP BY STEP.

Revolution in France. When the news of the storming of the Bastille in Paris on July 14, 1789 reached San Domingo, it sent shock waves reverberating through the island. The government in the French homeland was highly precarious and the populace bent on revolution. The Jews had laid the groundwork with their various political organizations, one of which was the powerful Jacobin Club, a Jewish forerunner of today’s Communist party. Another Paris organization that had an ominous bearing on the White colonists in San Domingo was an organization called “Amis des Noirs” — Friends of the Blacks.

The first move the new National Assembly in Paris made was a number of Decrees in March, 1790, which authorized each colony to formulate its future status and frame a constitution for its own government. Instead of stabilizing the situation, it sharpened political division among Whites and plunged them into a state of rancor beyond all likelihood of reconciliation. The resultant charter satisfied no one, and back in France this colonial constitution was roundly condemned.

Vote to the Mulattoes. This discord and dissension laid the groundwork for the second step.By the opening months of 1791 there came a turning of the tide, and the wave of revolution in Paris was rising fast. With the maneuvering and agitation of the “Amis des Noirs” and other Jewish factions, the National Assembly by the Decree of May 15, 1791, breached the color line in San Domingo and gave the vote and the right to office to mulattoes. From here on out there was set in motion a series of events from which there was no turning back.

Forebodings. When the news reached the island the mulattoes were ecstatic, while the Whites were steeped in forebodings of disaster. They knew this decree was only temporary and by its very language it condemned slavery and was foreshadowing its end.

Furious White Resistance. The White colonists were shocked into action and rose in a delirium of furious resistance. Governor Blanchelande was as shocked as the rest and sent word to Paris that “a frightful civil war and loss of the Colony to France may well result.” “The decree is regarded as murderous to the colony” he wrote back to Paris on July 31, 1791.

Appeal for Help. On February 20, 1792 the Colonial Assembly on the island drew up an appeal for 20,000 troops from France. But the Jacobins and the “Amis des Noirs” set themselves solidly against it and prevented the dispatch of any real aid to San Domingo.

San Domingo was doomed. A returned colonist from Bordeau described the situation: “You may announce that it is all over with San Domingo. One of three things will follow: the Whites will exterminate the whole mulatto caste; the mulattoes will destroy the Whites; or the negroes will profit by these dissensions to annihilate both the Whites and the mulattoes. But in any case San Domingo should be erased from the maps of France.”

Stab in the Back. The National Assembly in Paris threw further fuel on the fire. It rescinded the former decree and decreed that the colonists should decide their own requirements for franchise. This further infuriated the mulattoes. Then in a sweeping Decree of April 4, 1792 it again gave the franchise to all mulattoes and free niggers as well. It went further: it sent three Civil Commissioners from Paris to enforce the decree.

When this news reached the island the White population was crushed in despair.

Niggers Revolt. It was the beginning of a long dark epoch of horror, murder and slaughter. Plantations were burned. The black niggers revolted, the mulattoes took one side, then the other.

Civil War. Anarchy and destruction of a magnitude that we cannot describe followed this decree. This was soon followed by a further decree giving the franchise to all the savage African blacks, but this made little difference. Civil war, torture and extermination were unleashed and the Jewish Civil Commissioners not only did not abate the tide, but fomented the turn of the tide against the Whites for the next ten years.

Help from Napoleon. This death and destruction ensued until Napoleon Bonaparte firmly grasped the iron reins of power in France. Being resolute as well as a practical man, he determined to end this idiotic farce. He sent his brother-in-law, General Le Clerc, with two fleets and 20,000 French soldiers to restore order and save the colony. They set sail on December 14, 1801 and the first contingent arrived January 29, 1802.

The niggers by this time were running rampant over the island and had huge organized armies led by veteran leaders such as Generals Toussaint, Christophe, Dessalines and many other lesser sub-lieutenants, all dedicated to the massacre and extermination of the White Race.

Island Recaptured. When Gen. Le Clerc and his seasoned White troops arrived, they launched an aggressive and brilliant campaign to recapture the island, and restore White supremacy. In short order they recaptured the cities, forts and strong points of the island. Black insurgents were pursued into the woods and the mountains and hunted down. The black leaders soon surrendered and allied themselves to the new French authority in servile submission, and proclaimed undying loyalty.

Troops struck by Yellow Fever. Then came spring and summer of 1802 and with it the hot, malarial climate that was the bane of unacclimated Europeans. By mid-May yellow fever struck. The horror that smote the doomed army was unparalleled in the whole history of the West Indies. “The ravages of the disease are indescribable” wrote Gen. Le Clerc to his brother-in-law Napoleon. “At present I am losing 160 men a day.” Le Clerc himself was a sick man and most of his trusted aides were dead or dying.

Situation Desperate. The black leaders who had sworn undying loyalty to the French army were now beginning to defect and planning a massacre of the deteriorating and declining French forces. The situation of the French became desperate. Le Clerc was pleading for Napoleon to send reinforcements and a replacement for himself since he knew he was a dying man. Despite the desperate situation he did what he could to juggle what strength and resources he had left to keep the explosive black savages under control.

By August 6, Le Clerc reported that four fifths of his army was dead. The balance were weak and emaciated. He begged and implored Napoleon to send 12,000 fresh, acclimated troops immediately or all would be lost.

By November 2 of the same year he had arrived, Le Clerc himself was dead. Insurrection was again raging all over the island.

More Help. Napoleon had not abandoned the colony. He sent over a new Governor General named Rochambeau and 10,000 new troops which joined up with the remnants of Le Clerc’s contingent. The French position was greatly improving. Most of the first arrivals that had survived were now acclimated against the dread disease. In any case, it was the winter season again and the disease abated.

Rochambeau now determined to recover the lost ground. It was now a war of race, black against White, and the struggle assumed a most ferocious character.

Drastic Measures. Rochambeau and the White colonists decided that if they could ever hope to recover the island they must take drastic measures. It must be a war of extermination. They must exterminate all the black inhabitants over 12 years of age, since, they reasoned any adult black that for 12 years had been a soldier waging war against the Whites would never again go back to work in the fields and would to the end of his days be a potential insurgent and assassin. They must be replaced by fresh slaves from Africa. The same thing applied to the women, who were more cruel than the men.

With ruthless energy Rochambeau pursued his task. Through March and April of 1803 the rebels were steadily rooted out of the open country and pursued and hunted down even into the mountain hideouts.

Rochambeau’s triumph grew clearer every day. Napoleon was recruiting 15,000 fresh troops to maintain the army during the coming summer.

English Intervene, Aid Blacks. But history intervened. By May 12, 1803 the uneasy Peace of Amiens gave way to a new war with the British. The English war sounded the death-knell of San Domingo.The English fleet not only cut off further aid to the embattled French army, but the English at once aided the black rebels and the flame of insurrection burst forth with renewed fury. Scattered French garrisons of the coast towns were overwhelmed and slaughtered by the savage black troops under the leadership of Dessalines. By November 10, 1803 Governor General Rochambeau sailed out of the harbor of Le Cap and surrendered his sword to the waiting English Admiral.

French Finished. It was all over for the French. Of the 50,000 soldiers sent over in two short years to save the colony, only a few thousand ever saw France again, and these only after years in English captivity. The 10,000 sailors dead of yellow fever were sorely to be missed on the day of Trafalgar.

Whites Ruthlessly Exterminated. With the destruction of French authority, the extermination of the remnant Whites proceeded with cruel rapidity. Dessalines, the acknowledged black war chief, lost no time in declaring San Domingo an independent black republic. In December of 1803 he revived the Indian name “Haiti” to mark the complete break with the colonial past.

Black and Mulatto Warfare. For the next year a fierce struggle ensued with the other black and mulatto chiefs, but in the end Dessalines triumphed over all his enemies and in October of 1804 he proclaimed his victory by crowning himself “Emperor” in the style of European monarchs.

Whites Invited Back. The departure of the French army was not quite the end of the White presence in San Domingo, now called Haiti. When the French army left in November of 1803, Dessalines, in order to keep the economy from total collapse, promised protection to all White civilians who chose to remain. This favorable treatment even induced a considerable number of colonial Whites to return to the island. No sooner had Dessalines firmly established himself on the throne as Emperor when these unfortunate victims discovered the mistake of their lifetime.

Massacre of the Whites. Scarcely had the New Year of 1805 begun when orders went forth to massacre the White population. The horror and brutality of the ensuing butchery was indescribable. The murder of the Whites that began in the first days of January was finished en masse by March 18. All deaths were executed with extreme cruelty. Men and women were hewn down by sappers, who hacked off their arms and smashed in their chests. Some were poniarded, others mutilated, others disemboweled with knives, still others stuck like pigs. All were massacred down to the last woman and child.

Black Anarchy. The White race, with the help of the Jewish traitors out of Paris, had perished utterly from the land and the French “Jewel of the West Indies” had now become a rampant anarchy, the black “Republic of Haiti”.

* * * * *

We will skip most of the history of this fetid black pest-hole for the next 175 years, except to fill in a few outlines, since it embodies nothing but anarchy, terror, filth, and abject poverty.

Back to Slavery. After Dessalines crowned himself “Emperor Jacques I” in October 1804, and massacred all the Whites by March 1805, there was no one on the island to make the niggers work. Dessalines decreed forced labor (slavery), far more cruel than the blacks had ever suffered under the Whites. He was so hated by his own people he was assassinated in 1806, two years after he crowned himself.

 Out of the resultant anarchy two nigger states emerged: the north ruled by Henri Christophe (as “Emperor” Henri I) and the south ruled by the cruel hand of Alexandre Petion as a president for life. There was continued rivalry and warfare between the two. In 1818 Petion died or was murdered and Christophe took over.

Christophe was an unusually vigorous nigger, having some White blood in him. He became exceedingly vain, arrogant, pompous and cruel. Resentment and insurrection flared up against him. Realizing the hopelessness of his situation, he committed suicide in 1820.

 The rest of the history of Haiti to the present day is a meaningless continuation of further anarchy, cruelty and filthy poverty, an overpopulated island of stone-age savages, unable to maintain the White Man’s civilization and unable to govern themselves, and worst of all, unable to feed themselves in a productive land.

* * * * *

Lessons We Must Learn. We, the White Race must learn some harsh and inescapable lessons from the history of Haiti, if we are to survive. In the tragedy and extermination of the White Race on this most desirable piece of real estate set in the tropical breezes of the West Indies we can see the prelude to the fate of the White Race here in America and elsewhere in the world. These lessons are:

1. No multi-racial society can long survive as a civilization.

2. In any multi-racial society, the instinctive hatred between the races is permanent and irreconcilable. It is unbridgeable. It only needs the opportunity to flare up into open massacre.

3. As in Egypt, as in India, as in Haiti, there is always interbreeding between the races. The resulting mulattoes are the driving wedge for equality with the superior Whites. Mulattoes will join with niggers to destroy the Whites, then the niggers will turn on the mulattoes and destroy their superiors, in the end reducing the population down to its lowest denominator.

4. Niggers given “independence” and left to their own devices are incapable of governing themselves (except on the level of a primitive tribe) or even of feeding themselves above a starvation level.

5. Mulattoes out-breed the Whites, and niggers out-breed mulattoes.

6. The triumph of niggers over Whites is always and only accomplished by the treacherous conniving of the Jewish race. It is they who exploit and aggravate White divisiveness and then plan and execute the destruction of the White Race. The niggers are their most effective ploy and tool with which to accomplish this goal.

7. Slavery has been a curse for the White Race.

8. We never needed the niggers at any time, as is proven by the building and Winning of the West. In today’s highly developed technology the niggers are a most useless and dangerous parasite on the backs of the White Race.

9. We must rid ourselves of the niggers in our midst and ship them post haste back to Africa.

10. Niggers are absolutely poison in the midst of a White society.

11. In order for the White Race to survive, the White Man must have a strong sense of racial consciousness and must close ranks against not only the niggers, mulattoes and mud races, but above all against the Jews.

12. Basic to all this is the need for the White Race to have a racial religion around which to polarize his racial loyalty. This the CHURCH OF THE CREATOR is providing in CREATIVITY, our religious creed. In it the White Man has the Total Program, the Final Solution, and the Ultimate Creed.

The True Story of Haiti – and the Mass Murder of Whites under Black Rule

 The True Story of Haiti – and the Mass Murder of Whites under Black Rule

The Caribbean state of Haiti serves as a striking reminder of just how deadly the practice of slavery could be.

By 1804, the combined effect of thirteen years of uprisings, murder, and terrorism had destroyed the white population of Haiti, along with all agricultural production and the economy of what was formerly the most prosperous colony in the Western Hemisphere.

The island, originally named San Domingo, had become a center of Spanish activity during the time of the conquistador Hernando Cortes. The Spanish retained a small presence on the eastern side of the island, which is today known as the Dominican Republic. The western part of the island was settled by French traders in 1697 and renamed Saint-Domingue, and it was here that the ferocious race war took place.

The local Amerinds, called Canibales by the Spanish on account of their cannibalistic habits, had been reduced to insignificance by a combination of Spanish force of arms, slavery, and European diseases to which they had no immunity. As a result, the French started importing African slaves to work in the colony.

“The Jewel in the Crown” – Supplies Half of Europe’s Sugar Needs

By 1789, San Domingue was the jewel in the French colonial crown. Its ideal climate and naturally rich soil produced more sugar, coffee, and cotton than all of the then existing colonies in North America put together. San Domingue’s sugar output supplied not only all of France’s requirements, but half of the European continent’s needs as well.

San Domingue’s wealth was legendary, and by the time of the French Revolution, some 40,000 whites had settled in the colony. However, by this stage there were at least 450,000 black slaves toiling in the fields to maintain the island’s prodigious agricultural output, and in addition there were approximately 27,000 mulattoes. This huge nonwhite population, mostly kept under conditions of slavery, provided the demographic time bomb which utterly destroyed the white colony.

French Revolution – Move to Give Nonwhites the Franchise

The French Revolution of 1789 served as a spark which ignited the long-simmering racial pressures in San Domingue. A decree by the French national assembly of May 15, 1791, gave the white and mixed-race population on the island the right to vote.

The white settlers on the island immediately protested. The aptly-named governor general of the island, Blanchelande, sent a message to Paris warning that the implementation of such a form of government would result in “a frightful civil war” and the loss of the colony for France.

The French National Assembly then rescinded the earlier decree and issued a new one saying that the colonists themselves could decide on what form of government was best for their own particular circumstances. When this news was made known in San Domingue, it heightened tensions. The mixed-race population in particular were in an uproar after being informed that they had the vote and then only a few months later told the opposite.

“Amis des Noirs” – French Revolutionaries

A strong anti-slavery lobby, Amis des Noirs (“friends of the blacks”), developed in France, and grew increasingly powerful over the course of the revolution. This abolitionist group agitated constantly for emancipation and full political rights for both mulattoes and blacks in San Domingue, and reacted with outrage to the second decree which took away the right to vote for the mixed-race element.

As a result of the Amis des Noir’s efforts, the French national assembly issued a third decree which gave voting rights back to mulattoes and “free blacks,” that is, those blacks not under any form of indentured labor.

When this news was received in San Domingue, the now-armed black population launched a violent rebellion. Whites were attacked at random, plantations burned, and the island plunged into chaos. The mixed-race population initially sided with the whites but then switched allegiance to the blacks.

Blacks Exterminate All Whites In Haiti

By the end of the uprising in Haiti, every white man, woman, and child had been murdered. Once the whites had been exterminated, the black population then turned on the mixed-race population and wiped them out as well.

Chaos Reigns for Ten Years

The chaos continued until 1802 when a detachment of twenty thousand French troops was sent by Napoleon Bonaparte to restore order to the island. The French forces, under the command of Napoleon’s brother-in-law, General Leclerc, crushed the rebellion. The insurgents were ruthlessly hunted down and the main rebel leaders forced to pledge allegiance to the new French government.

Just when the situation seemed to have stabilized, two disastrous events occurred. The first was the news that the Napoleonic government had given permission for the reinstitution of slavery, and the second was an outbreak of yellow fever on San Domingue. The possibility that the institution of slavery could return reignited black unrest on the island. Meanwhile, the already thinly stretched French forces were decimated by disease, which killed as many as 160 soldiers per day. By August 1802, four fifths of the French troops who had arrived earlier in the year were dead.

Napoleon sent ten thousand fresh troops to bolster the beleaguered French garrison. The new troops were also laid low by yellow fever, and the rebellious blacks, largely immune to the disease, stepped up their attacks. The security situation on the island deteriorated once again.

The conflict then took an even nastier turn. The French authorities decided that the only way to bring the twelve-year-old race war to an end was to kill all black inhabitants over the age of twelve years. The reasoning for this was that any adult black who had, for the previous decade at least, waged a racial war against whites, would never meekly go back to working in the fields. The same applied to black women, the French decided, as the females of that race had proven themselves to be even more vicious and cruel to captured whites than their menfolk. With ruthless energy, the surviving French troops pursued their new orders, and many blacks were killed in this arbitrary fashion. Both sides were plunged into a spiral of tit-for-tat atrocities which seemed to have no end.

French Withdraw and Blacks Rule

The outbreak of the Napoleonic Wars intervened in developments on the island. France became embroiled in a war with Britain at sea, and the French colonial possession of San Domingue came under attack. The British navy blockaded the island, cut off supplies to the French garrison, and supplied the black rebels with guns and ammunition.

The most prominent of the black rebel leaders, Dessalines, launched a number of attacks on the increasingly isolated French garrisons in the coastal towns. Dessalines took town after town from the weakened French forces, and systematically exterminated all the whites taken prisoner. By November 10, 1803, the French could no longer hold out and surrendered to the British fleet off the coast. Of the fifty thousand French troops sent to the island, only a few thousand ever made it back to France.

The Massacre of the Last Whites

With the French gone, the black leader Dessalines had a free hand in instituting his own reign of terror against any whites still unfortunate enough to be on the island state. San Domingue was renamed Haiti in December 1803 and declared independent.

The country because the second independent nation in the Western Hemisphere (after the United States of America) and the first independent black-ruled nation in the Caribbean.

Having disposed of the whites, the blacks and the mixed-race population turned on each other in yet another race war. This ended with the almost complete annihilation of the mulatto population, and in October 1804, Dessalines declared his people to be the winners. To mark the occasion, he declared himself “emperor for life” of Haiti.

The same year, Dessalines asked those whites who had fled, to return and help rebuild the economy. A surprisingly large number of colonists took up his offer, but soon discovered the nature of their error.

Early in 1805 the black population once again rose up against the returned white settlers. Dessalines was powerless to control the mobs, despite the white colonists’ pleas. The Europeans were hunted down and, on March 18, 1805, the very last white person in Haiti was killed.

Comical Haitian “Army” 1899. The Haitian army on parade in 1899: a comical collection of “generals” with almost no soldiers, as vividly captured in the book Where Black Rules White (H. H. Prichard).

San Domingue, which under French rule was once the richest land in all the Caribbean, is today a Third World shambles of poverty, anarchy, and chaos. This state of affairs is even more meaningful when it is considered that the independent state of Haiti is only thirty-five years younger than the United States of America.

It is a devastating counterargument to the “environmental” theory of development—because if time and environment were the only factors influencing civilization, Haiti, in theory, should be as advanced as America.

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Feminism = Insanity

 Feminism is anti sexual equality, and therefore anti Creativity. We Creators believe in the equal importance of both sex's. Period!! Feminism goes against this. Feminism is a jewish invention. Feminism is ANTI WOMAN!!

Tuesday, July 27, 2021

The Anti-Whiteness of the Olympic Games!!

  The Olympics are a Sham!!

The original olympics were about peace and the individual. They were NOT used as a show place for countries to wave their dicks around. When the Greeks held the games all wars stopped, players competed for solo honours, and the first place winner brought glory to himself and his family.... The Olympics of the ancient world, including the Roman games, were about expanding the Aryan body as far as it could go. It was a way for Whites to embrace their racial pride.

Today the Olympic games are about money, dick waving of flags, and as of the 21st century a propaganda machine for the evil's of anti-White racism!! In the last 10-15 years the games have done all they can to push the vile myth of equality, as well as persecute White athletes. Russia is constantly attacked for it's Whiteness. Negroes and mutts are paraded as the superiors to Whites. Countries take centre stage, pushing the individual aside. And money rules all. Hardly the spirit of Ancient Greece!!

And let's not forget that ANYTHING seems to stop the modern games. Wars, a fake flu, anything just slams the breaks on them!! The complete opposite of the ideal's started 2800 years ago.

To see negroes held up as superior to Europeans just because they learn at age 5 to run away from the cops after stealing something is pure insanity. The purity of our blood, the superiority of our IQ, the creative abilities that we have and no other race has is what makes us the Master Race. Simply being able to shoplift and sprint down the street with your trousers down to the knees doesn't make you smart or superior.

And the money!! The modern games seems to be about money worship. Since when was athletic ability determined by how much your shoes cost? Or how many product endorsements you get? It is supposed to be about you, as an individual, and the body-strength that YOU ALONE trained on.

Don't forget the massive dick waving that goes on. How did these games become about countries? No wonder they stop these modern games for wars. It's so the sheeple can go die for the jews and their lackies. Morons....

Anyway, fuck these fake olympic games!! They are no different than the gringos' Super Bowl, the Academy Awards, or a television commercial.... It is all a load of bullocks!!

Oh, and by the way, amerika:



Rev. Dr. Hardy Lloyd, PM

Sunday, July 25, 2021

Saturday, July 24, 2021



By Ben Klassen - 1973

Most Christians are under the impression that if you only believe, then getting to heaven is pretty straight forward. Most preachers and the various churches will tell you how simple it is to have “salvation,” and it is all for free! All you have to do is — just…simply…believe… So they tell us.

But, as you read the fuzzy details as spelled out in the bible you apprehensively find it is not at all that simple. In fact, the more you read the bible and try to find out just how you can get to that there “salvation” the more confusing, the more complicated, the more ambiguous, and the more difficult it gets. In fact, there are so many ambiguous and contradictory quotations by Christ saying that because of such and such you cannot get into the kingdom of heaven, that instead of it being so simple, we find there are so many conflicting stipulations, all of which say that you can’t get salvation, say that you can’t get to heaven.

By the time you get through examining and finding all the road blocks that are placed in your way, you find out that you just can’t get there — which means that practically everyone is condemned to go to hell and burn forever and ever. Evidently, there are only two camps. If you can’t get to heaven, you’re going to go to hell.

These are the supposedly “Glad Tidings” and “Good News” that Christianity brought.

Let us now examine the different roadblocks. In Matt. 7:21 Christ says, “Not everyone that says to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven, but he that doeth the will of my Father, which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name and in thy name cast out devils, and, in thy name, done many wonderful works? And then I will profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” In other words, despite your efforts, despite your good deeds, despite your loyalty, Christ says: you can go to hell.

In Matt. 8:10 he says, “Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. And I say unto you that many shall come from the East and West and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into the outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth…” Pretty fuzzy, but if the “children of the kingdom” are going to hell, you can be sure the rest aren’t going to heaven either.

We are just starting but already we are beginning to see the exclusions pile up, one after another, and they all add up to this: the majority of these people are excluded from entering the kingdom of heaven, and of course, therefore they are programmed, planned, and scheduled to go to hell. There is no middle road. But let us go further.

In Matt. 10:37 Christ says, “He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: And he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.” We can most assuredly assume that those who are further relegated to this category and are not worthy of him are most certainly not going to get into the kingdom of heaven, so add these millions further to the list. They, too, are going to hell. How many people do you know that have categorically come out and made the commitment that they love Christ more than they do their father or mother or their son or daughter? How many people do you know that have taken up their cross and followed him, especially since crosses are rather hard to come by, and since it is most confusingly unclear just what it is that you must do to follow him?

In Matt. 12:31 Christ says, “Wherefore I say unto you, all manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.” So there, if you have blasphemed against the Holy Ghost, whatever that is, you’ve had it. You have no further chance of any forgiveness or redemption or the slightest chance of mercy. From that point on you are going straight to hell no matter what and there is no further court of appeal.

In Matt. 12:36 he says, “But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the Day of Judgment. For by thy words thou shall be justified, and by thy words thou shall be condemned.” If such are the rules of the game, everybody would be in just about continuous jeopardy, because who knows, any word you might say might be the one by which you will be condemned. Isn’t that a comforting thought? This is some more of that real “Good News” that Christianity brought to you.

Let us proceed further with Matt. 13:41. “The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity: And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.” This is, of course, rather fuzzy but undoubtedly here goes another shipload of poor souls destined for the fiery furnace.

It isn’t really so simple to get to heaven after all, is it? In fact, we have already piled up enough categories that would embrace just about every living human being. 

But let us proceed.

In Matt. 15:4 Christ says, “For God commanded, saying, Honor thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.” Chalk up another transgression that will doom the offender to the fiery pit.

Matt. 15:22, 23 and 24 give the following story: “And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, have mercy on me, O Lord, Thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he answered and said, ‘I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’”

So here, evidently, we have a new development. We find that the only people Christ claims he was sent to bring salvation to was the House of Israel. Apparently that would completely wash out the rest of us that are Gentiles and not Jews. Then we have the further perplexing situation that none of the Jews believe in Christ and therefore would be excluded from salvation also. So who is there left? Confusing as all this may be, and undoubtedly is meant to be, this is further confirmed by John 4:22 where Christ is speaking to the women of Samaria and says to her, “Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.” Evidently he is spelling it out to the Gentiles: salvation is a Jewish thing and the Gentiles are so confused they don’t know what they’re worshipping. With this I heartily agree.

But let us continue. Then Jesus said unto his disciples, “If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.” (Matt. 16:24.) This is one of those confusing pieces of double talk where you don’t know whether you’re coming or going, but in any case, those of you who would try to save your life are going to lose it and evidently will not get to heaven.

Proceeding in the same book, Chapter 18:3, Christ further admonishes and excludes, “Verily I say unto you, except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.” Proceeding to v.6, “But who so shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” From this we may gather that we are to act humble and become simple minded as little children again, and forget all the experiences and judgment that we have acquired through all our years of maturity, or else we are not qualified to enter the kingdom of heaven. Furthermore, if we have offended any of these little ones, those people, too, are better off if they had a millstone hanged about their necks and were drowned. Evidently these, too, are disqualified from entering the kingdom of heaven and destined to perdition. They, too, are going to hell.

We are finding that it is harder and harder to get into the kingdom of heaven. The list of those who are not going to get there becomes greater and greater, and in the same chapter v. 34, Christ says, “And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him. So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.” Add a further huge multitude of those that did not forgive their brothers their trespasses. They, too, shall be chalked off and “delivered” to the tormentors. They, too, are going to hell.

The list is growing and the obstacles are piling up. In Matt. 19:20, it says, “The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?” and Jesus said unto him, “If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shall have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.” When the young man went away “sorrowful,” Jesus said to his disciples, “Verily I say unto you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. Again I say unto you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” Now here we have added to the exclusion, which is now growing by leaps and bounds, all those people who have “riches”. It says further in v. 25, “When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying who then can be saved?” A real good question. Jesus blandly gave them this reassuring double-talk, “With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.” This is typical. If you can’t explain things in a sensible and logical way, just say, “Well, we operate in the field of magic, anything goes, and it doesn’t have to make sense.”

The doom and damnation continues. We are to be booby-trapped and caught with our pants down at the moment when we least expect. This is thrown at us just so that we will be nervous and on edge at all times, never knowing when the boom is going to be lowered. “The Lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, and shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” (Matt. 24:50, 51)

Vengeance and damnation proceed unabated. “Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:

“For I was an hungered, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:

“I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.

“Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungered, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?

“Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. 

“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment:” Matt. 25:14-46.

Do you still think it is as simple as “just believing”? Far from being simple, it is getting extremely complicated and the odds are mounting not only a hundred to one but a thousand to one that nobody, but nobody, can hurdle all the booby-traps that are put in the way of getting to “heaven”. On the other hand there is no middle road. Those that don’t go to heaven all go to eternal damnation and hell fire.

But there is more, much more. There are many repetitions in the chapters in Mark, also Luke, and also John, with various embellishments and variations thereof. We are not going to belabor the subject much further. In Mark 11:26 Christ says, “But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.” In Luke 6:24, 25, he goes after those terrible rich again and says, “But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation. Woe unto you that are full! for ye shall hunger. Woe unto you that laugh now! for ye shall mourn and weep.” The moral here is supposed to be that if you have things pretty well under control, worry anyway, just worry, worry, worry. See nothing but doom and gloom ahead. These, after all, are “Good Tidings,” you know. Your reward shall be in the hereafter, and the chances are a thousand to one your reward shall be eternal hell fire.

We skip over the rest of Mark and Luke and so that we won’t entirely neglect John, we quote from John 3:3 where Christ says, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” And in v. 5, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and the spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”

So there we have it, hell fire and damnation. Wailing, weeping and gnashing of teeth. Eternal damnation. Woe unto you. Better a millstone were hanged around your neck and you were cast into the sea. Everlasting punishment. Damnation and hell. Cast them into a furnace of fire. Ye shall be cast into the utter darkness.

The Gospels are just full of doom and damnation throughout their entirety. This is supposed to be “Good Tidings” that Christ brought to the world. The salvation that your preacher keeps dangling in front of you, even by their own rules, is so ridiculous and so impossible to overcome that nobody, just about nobody, is going to qualify to be one of those that go into the “Kingdom of Heaven”.

Speaking of heaven, let us just examine what kind of a place it is supposed to be. Whereas hell is described in most graphic and frightening terms, the descriptions of heaven are most sketchy and, to say the least, very fuzzy. In Matt. 13:31, Christ says, “The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field: which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.” v. 33, “The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.” Does that give you any kind of a picture of a place you would just break your neck to get to?

In the next chapter we find a few more tidbits and morsels that are not too descriptive but they are the best we could find. In Matt. 13 starting with v. 44, Christ says further, “Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto treasure hid in a field; the which when a man hath found, he hideth, and for joy thereof goeth and selleth all that he hath, and buyeth that field. Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a merchant man, seeking goodly pearls: Who, when he had found one pearl of great price, went and sold all that he had, and bought it. Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind: which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away. So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just.”

Does that give you any kind of a picture of heaven, or are you still puzzled about the nature of “your reward in the hereafter”? As far as I can see, this doesn’t present much of a picture of anything but a lot of double-talk, and frankly I am not at all the type that would want to go to such a nebulous and ill-described place. But just to make sure that you don’t miss the point that the other alternative is pretty horrible, the 50th verse follows the 49th which we just quoted previously and Christ there says, “And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.”

Can you get to Heaven? Not likely in any case, and especially not so if Christ can help it. 

After Christ had laid down his creed and spelled out all the suicidal advice for the destruction of those who would embrace his creed, he supposedly then organized a campaign to disseminate this teaching further into all the world. Purportedly, he then gathered around him 12 Disciples, rank amateurs, which are named in chapter 10 of Matthew. These 12 blundering accomplices, who evidently were not too bright and couldn’t seem to understand what it was he was saying, Jesus then sent forth and commanded them saying, “Go not thou in the way of the Gentiles and into any other cities of the Samaritans enter ye not, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matt. 10:5) 

Now there is a very contradictory passage here. Jesus was commanding his disciples not to spread the word for the new teaching to the Samaritans or the Gentiles, but to give it exclusively to the Jews. It is rather strange, therefore, that it was the Jews who rejected his teachings, but the Gentiles who embraced it. We suspect that it was undoubtedly planned the way it happened, but that’s what it says in Matt. 10:5, 6, namely for his disciples not to teach it to the Gentiles or the Samaritans, but only to the Jews.

In Matt. 10:21, he openly predicts what the divisive effect of his teachings will be and says, “And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death. And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake.”

When we see all the destructive wars that were fought in the name of Christianity, such as, for instance, the Thirty Years War from 1618 to 1648, we can see what he means by this prediction. During that war, along with hundreds of others, brother did rise up against brother and deliver him unto death, and in fact, about one third of all the Germans were decimated in that bloody, fratricidal religious war, with brother killing brother, and 5/6 of all the housing in the land was destroyed. By no means was this the only war that was fought in the name of Christianity, but throughout Europe, brother fought brother, Protestant fought Catholic, and the White Man destroyed himself with a vengeance, all in the name of Christ. Today, in Ireland, this is still going on. Christianity, in fact, is an exercise in self-destruction.

An interesting question about all this “believing” business is this: Why should anyone be coerced into believing anything? If you are not freely convinced about a situation on the strength of the evidence presented, or the lack of it, why must you be threatened with torture, vengeance and retribution?

Isn’t this the method used by tyrants and gangsters? Isn’t this the same method used by the Communists? Either accept communism or we’ll shoot you — that is also the code of Jewish communism in Russia, China and elsewhere.

Any belief arrived at under threat or coercion is, in any case, a dishonest one. It is a “belief” one might be stampeded into temporarily under the influence of panic or fear, but it is neither a rational conviction, nor can it be an honest belief.

Yet throughout the bible, this gangster method of threat, coercion, and fear is used to get people to believe: either you believe in Christ and all his hocus-pocus or you are going to hell, he says, or better, the Jewish scriptwriters say. What a sleazy operation!

In Matt. 10:34 he says further, “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth; I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.”

In Matt. 12:25, Jesus really spells out the crux of the Jewish technique for destroying the Gentiles, when he says, “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.”

We see in the previous teachings he has already said that he has come to divide, and divide he did. The more these nefarious teachings spread throughout Rome, and the Roman Empire itself, the more the process of dissolution and the ferment of disintegration set in. As these teachings spread and the Roman citizens, good people that they were, fell for all this bad advice, they became confused, they became confounded, and they became divided. They forsook the good judgment that they had built up over the centuries and they abandoned their good senses. They lost all sense of responsibility to their family. Their patriotism was completely undermined, and we know the rest is history. The Roman Empire and the White civilization that it embodied, crumbled, and fell to ruin.